2 policemen moonlighting for Rep. Duterte may be sacked – PNP
These cops were spotted in viral bar video

Images grabbed from a video show a man, purportedly Davao City Rep. Paolo “Pulong” Duterte, and seemingly wielding a knife, assaulting another, already submissive man at Barrio Obrero bar in the lawmaker’s home city. The video also showed several people witnessing the incident but doing nothing to stop the aggressor.
MANILA, Philippines — Two police officers who were found allegedly moonlighting as bodyguards for Davao Rep. Paolo “Pulong” Duterte, may be dismissed from the service. This is according to Philippine National Police chief Gen. Rommel Francisco Marbil said Wednesday
The policemen were identified along with two military personnel in a video circulating online showing Duterte in an altercation at a bar in Davao City.
READ: DOJ to evaluate complaints against Davao City Rep. Duterte
“We will file dishonesty [charges]. Once we file dishonesty, that’s perpetual disqualification from any government post,” Marbil told reporters.
“They are not authorized; they are moonlighting. They surrendered their firearms as well as their IDs, but they went AWOL (absent without official leave),” he said, without giving details.
The immediate superiors of the two police officers are also being investigated, he added.
READ: Vlogger faces cybercrime case over Duterte house raid claims
“Every day, we submit reports; we account for our personnel. Moonlighting wouldn’t happen if they didn’t falsify their reports. So those two who were moonlighting in Davao—expect that their commanders will be discharged,” Marbil said.
Businessman Kristone John Patria, who said he was attacked by Duterte in the Feb. 23 incident, filed a complaint for physical injuries and grave threats against the congressman before the Department of Justice on May 2.
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of Cebudailynews. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.